PLEASE ATTACH EACH
Deliverable
Seperated……Please name each attach by it Deliverable
Deliverable 4 – Leadership Qualities
Deliverable 5 – Report on Motivation
Deliverable 6 – Communication Plan
Deliverable 7 – SWOT Analysis Presentation
Deliverable 4 – Leadership Qualities
Objective
Differentiate between various management and leadership styles.
Instructions
Case Study
Read the above case study and prepare the necessary documents as explained below.
You have recently been hired at Blackrocks as a consultant in organizational effectiveness in the company. Your role is to consider the organization’s hierarchy and whether or not the senior-most leaders provide direction, vision, and inspiration through their leadership.
Identify the leader and management qualities of the co-CEOs and their ability in achieving shared objectives and higher level organizational goals. Remember this report should have a clear Introduction (Overview of the Case Study), Body (each of the points below addressed), and Conclusion.
1. Introduction: an overview of the case study
2. Present key ideas and concepts about leadership:
a. What are the leader and management qualities of the co-CEOs?
b. Compare and contrast the key leadership styles of the co-CEOs.
c. Examine the relationship between power and leadership.
d. In what ways are the organizational requirements for leadership met?
e. How would you know if those requirements are in place and successful?
3. Conclusion: summary of the discussed concepts.
Objective
Examine the fundamentals of the manager/employee relationship, such as motivation, performance, and leadership through their (student) response to various situations.
Instructions
Case Study
Read the above case study and prepare the necessary documents as explained below.
Read the above case study and prepare the necessary documents as explained below. You have recently been hired at Blackrocks as a consultant in Organizational Effectiveness. Submit a report to the CEOs of Blackrocks detailing the effect of motivation within their organization. Consider the role that motivation has on employee effectiveness and evaluate the impact of Performance Appraisals on motivation in the workplace. Create leadership programs that implement motivation theories that have been found to be effective in the organization. Your report will include the following:
1. Introduction to your findings.
2. Detail how motivation has affected employee effectiveness with the use of self-assessments.
3. Evaluate the impact of Performance Appraisals on motivation.
4. Using the information from the Performance Appraisals, identify professional development opportunities (i.e.; workshops, guest speakers) that implement motivational theories that have been effective in the organization.
5. How would you know if the leadership programs were effective?
6. Conclusion.
Objective
Demonstrate an understanding of legal and ethical issues affecting manager/employee relations.
Instructions
Case Study
Read the above case study and prepare the necessary documents as explained below.
You have recently been hired at Blackrocks as a consultant in Organizational Effectiveness. Your role as the consultant is to create a Communication Plan that incorporates various communication factors and implications of effective communication within the organization. Analyze communication differences related to culture within the organization and customer base. Examine the roles that the organization’s communication channels play along with the various communications factors that contribute to employee conflict. Consider the legal implications of effective communication in the organization. Lastly, interpret the current business landscape and discuss how communication facilitates everything. Your Communication Plan will include the following:
1. Introduction to your findings.
2. Detail communication differences related to culture within the organization’s customer base and the staff.
3. Evaluate the communication channels that can contribute to employee conflict.
4. Examine the legal implications of effective communication in the organization.
5. Interpret the current business landscape and discuss how communication facilitates everything.
6. Conclusion of your plan.
Instructions
Case Study
Read the above case study and prepare the necessary documents as explained below.
You have been called in as a Business Analyst Consultant for Blackrocks. Review the case study and create a SWOT analysis presentation for the Blackrocks leadership team. Your PowerPoint presentation should include the following:
1. Title slide.
2. Overview of presentation/Introduction.
3. SWOT Analysis.
a. Include internal or external factors that relate to:
i. Current business environment.
ii. Building of teams.
iii. Management’s role in strategic planning.
iv. The importance of a strong corporate culture.
v. Leadership/Motivation.
vi. Communication.
4. Create effective solutions to address multiple weaknesses and/or threats.
5. Create recommendations to capture on multiple opportunities.
6. Conclusion.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 103 The Clute Institute
Blackrocks: Craft Brewing – From Hobby
To Business: Applying Strategic
Management To The Small Firm
Brian Gnauck, Northern Michigan University, USA
Claudia Hart, Northern Michigan University, USA
Larry Pagel, Northern Michigan University, USA
ABSTRACT
Blackrocks, a craft beer start-up company, first opened in Marquette, Michigan, a town of 20,000
residents, in 2010. The business evolved around a friendship and a mutual interest in craft beer
and is located in Marquette’s “Village,” an area close to the local university consisting of several
full-service restaurants, sandwich shops, bars, and retail shops. The Village considers itself an
independent retail section of
Marquette.
The ambience of Blackrocks is “fun and good times.” People of all ages are attracted to the bar to
enjoy craft beer with their family and friends. The physical setting is rustic with a current capacity
of 50 customers (soon to expand to 100 customers). Customers can bring in their own food or call
a local eatery for pizza or sandwich delivery.
Blackrocks has a very loose organizational structure which has worked well in the past. This case
will allow students to identify the problems faced by Blackrocks in today’s economy; to describe
the internal and external environment of Blackrocks; to identify their core competencies; to
identify Blackrocks’ strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats; and to develop
management strategies which could further enhance the business and help them attain their
mission and goals.
Keywords: Craft Beer; Organizational Strategies; Organizational Structure; External Environment; Internal
Environment; Core Competencies; Management Strategy
INTRODUCTION
et’s meet the employees of Blackrocks. The owners, the Ambassador of Fermentology and Brewsician –
Andy Langlois and David Manson were two, but there were also characters like the Wizard of Ales, the
Monk of LaMash, the Gangster of the Great White North, and the Friend of Woodland Creatures
Everywhere (the longest name of any employee in the business).
Blackrocks, the company, liked to enjoy life, have fun, and at the same time make money. The
general
attitude the business presented was pure Adam Smith “laissez faire,” anything goes. Formal titles were few, but fun
titles abound. At the same time, it was a real business with concern about sales, cost controls, growth, and serving
customer needs.
Andy and David expressed concerns about the future demand for craft beer and beer in general. Craft beer
in the U.S. represented 7.5 percent of beer by volume and 9.1 percent by revenue. Would the demand for craft beer
crash or begin to fall off? (Remember, the demand for pop in the U.S. declined in the last 10 years.) Would the
overall interest in craft beer begin to wane? These were unknowns. They also expressed concern whether the
demand for onsite beer would decline. Should they develop bottled beer for resale through wholesalers to retail
L
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 104 The Clute Institute
outlets? The policy of Blackrocks had been to stress variety. Each week new and different flavors of beer were
created. Since opening in December 2010, they brewed over 150 different beers. Some beer rotated on a semi-
regular basis, but the majority was new every week. They had not established a “brand” that represented the brewer,
“Blackrocks.”
Samuel Adams, for example, had created “Samuel Adams Boston Lager,” which supported a variety of
other beer. Could Blackrocks create a brand that would sell over the counter? Did they need a beer that represented
the brewer, “Blackrocks”? Was their business model sound? What issues should Andy and David focus on?
Answers to these and other questions were constantly on their minds.
THE ORIGIN
Blackrocks started in December 2010 in Marquette, Michigan, a town of 20,000 residents, which expanded
by 50 percent when the students of Northern Michigan University arrived each fall. The business was the brain child
of Langlois and Manson.
Both men were in their 40’s and faced the typical challenges of family life. Andy was married with two
kids. He was a Northern Michigan University graduate. His previous work included Director of Sales for a surgical
parts company and a drug representative. David was a Michigan State University graduate and worked for a
Midwest food distribution company and also as a pharmaceutical sales representative for 16 years. Their wives
worked – one was a school teacher and the other was a government manager.
The business evolved around a friendship and a mutual interest (avocation) of craft beer. This hobby grew
into the idea of a business, and in 2010 they opened to the public in an old, private residence (zoned business by
2010) at 424 N. Third Street in Marquette, Michigan (see Figure 1). They were able to buy the building, giving up a
small interest in their business.
Figure 1: Blackrocks, 424 N. Third Street
Photo by M. Vroman, 2013
Third Street in Marquette, Michigan, was called “The Village” and consisted of a number of full-service
restaurants, sandwich shops, bars, and unrelated retail outlets. The Village promoted itself as an independent retail
section of town. It was a natural corridor of 13 blocks leading south from the university to the “Main” Street of the
town.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 105 The Clute Institute
Given that Marquette was a university town, it was common for students to start a night celebrating by
moving from bar to bar along Third Street. In this context, Blackrocks was a flow-through site as the customers
moved north or south along this street. In simple terms, it was a great location for a craft beer business.
The ambience of Blackrocks was “fun and good times.” Its physical setting was rustic. The hardwood oak
floors creaked, as did the stairs to the second floor. The bar was an old, aged-oak structure that had seen extensive
use by customers and lots of spilled beer (see Figure 2). In the spring of 2013, Andy and David planned to renovate
the second floor to accommodate an additional 50 people. When finished, the legal capacity was 100 people (1,200
sq. ft.). There was a porch around the building which served as overflow when temperatures reached over 40 degrees
(outdoor heat lamps were prevalent) and in the summer and fall periods. Seating capacity was limited to about 15 so
the rest of the patrons stood.
Figure 2: Blackrocks Bar
Photo by M. Vroman, 2013
The fun-loving, informal atmosphere was even more evident by patrons carrying in their own food or
calling local eateries for pizza or sandwich delivery. Crowded tables and benches were often filled with crock pots
full of soup, appetizers, or other favorite accompaniments. Blackrocks did not have a kitchen so food regulation was
not an issue. A night at Blackrocks was characterized by a high decibel rating and lots of conversation and laughter.
Local musicians frequently entertained and open mic nights were common.
TARGET MARKET
Blackrocks targeted patrons of all ages. Lots of 21
st
birthday parties occurred, but the brewery attracted
people in their 30’s, 40’s, 50’s, and 60’s, as well as an occasional 90 year-old. It was not uncommon to see a 21
year-old sitting next to a surgeon with a university professor as part of a conversation.
THE MUGS
Shortly after opening, a friend and an art teacher at NMU suggested Blackrocks try to promote interest in
German ceramic beer mugs. These mugs were all unique and fit the fun, rustic ambience of Blackrocks (see Figure
3). The mugs cost the customer $40, but they brought the customer to the business. They hung on the walls, ceiling,
and just about everywhere at the bar. Customers came in the door, grabbed their mug and had it filled at the bar. The
mugs were truly works of art. In the course of 2½ years, they sold 986 mugs. A side benefit to Blackrocks was that
the company did not have to invest in as many glass mugs because the customers supplied their own. The mugs also
accommodated the rustic nature of the building and enhanced the “fun and good times” ambience.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 106 The Clute Institute
Figure 3: The Mugs of Blackrocks
Photos by M. Vroman, 2013
THE MISSION
Even though the environment was one of fun and laughter, there was a serious side to the business. Andy
and David established their “mission” as an integral part of what their business stood for when they created it in
2010 (see Figure 4).
Blackrocks is committed to fun, our community and diverse craft beer. We started as a nano brewery and will
operate as such always. Our goal is steady growth brewing with quality ingredients and keeping a little crazy in our
culture. We encourage our members, employees, and customers to give input in our operations and demand they
know the brewing process and encourage mistakes.
Figure 4: Blackrocks Mission
Source: Company Records, 2013
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 107 The Clute Institute
This mission tied the product to the customer and helped define what Blackrocks was all about – a happy,
fun place to be and a mutual interest (proprietor – customer) in craft beer.
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
The easiest way to explain Blackrocks’ structure was to say there was none. Andy and David were the
owners (the former building owner had a small interest). There were four full-time employees of the company.
Besides the owners, the following is a description of the two other full-time employees, Andrew Reeves and Chris
Hutte.
Andrew Reeves: Andrew was the head brewer. He was a 27 year-old having grown up in Holland,
Michigan, and then worked for AmeriCorps in Colorado where he was exposed to the craft beer business. He then
attended Northern Michigan University majoring in history.
Chris Hutte: Chris earned a Computer Information Systems degree from Northern Michigan University.
He had been a part-time worker at a local party store that sold home hobby craft beer supplies and equipment.
There were seven part-time employees of the business. These people were brewers, bartenders, servers, keg
cleaners and took on marketing responsibilities.
The organizational structure was flat with two levels of management. Andy and David were co-owners, and
the rest reported to them in somewhat of an undefined, unknown manner. Things seemed to get done, however. To a
degree, beer was brewed on schedule to make sure sufficient supplies were available when the business was open,
supplies were ordered (barley, hops, wheat, rye, oats, nutella, lavender, honey, and peppers), and hours were
assigned for work shifts.
THE 2013 ECONOMY
The Wall Street Journal reported that the 4
th
quarter gross domestic product of the U.S. in 2012 was revised
upward from a -.1 percent growth to a +.1 percent growth in January 2013. At the federal level, the U.S. House of
Representatives was in an ongoing stalemate with the U.S. Senate and the President regarding spending cuts and tax
increases. Unemployment stood at 7.7 percent, and interest rates were at historic lows. The federal funds rate was 0
to .25 percent, while the home mortgage rate for top-line borrowers was 3.25 percent for a 30-year mortgage.
The State of Michigan had recovered from its depressed state with a balanced budget and 8.8 percent level
of unemployment (“Department of Numbers,” 2013). The Upper Peninsula of Michigan was somewhat depressed
with an unemployment rate of 10.3 percent (Walton, 2013). However, the City of Marquette, the largest city in the
Upper Peninsula of Michigan, was rather robust. This was because of Marquette General Hospital’s 2,000
employees and 200 physicians (a for-profit hospital, part of the Duke Lifepoint System), Northern Michigan
University’s 1,000 employees (student body of 9,500 students), gambling in the Upper Peninsula which employed
about 1,500 in the Central Upper Peninsula, and Cliffs Natural Resources’ 1,800 employees (an iron ore mining
complex located 40 miles west of Marquette).
THE BEER BREWING PROCESS
Brewing the beer began with the raw grain, which was most commonly malted barley for most beer styles.
Other raw materials were wheat, rye, and oats, which could be added at different proportions for various beer styles.
The malted barley was first crushed to break open the hulls. This was then mixed with hot water (roughly
145-158 degrees) to create the “mash.” During the mash, two enzymes (alpha and beta) worked to break down
complex carbohydrate chains into simple sugars within the grain. This was important because yeast needed simple
sugars to convert to alcohol later in the fermentation process.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 108 The Clute Institute
Mashing usually lasted for 60-90 minutes, then the liquid (called the “wort”) was transferred to the boil
kettle, and the spent grain was disposed of. The wort was then boiled for 60-90 minutes. During the boil, hops were
added to balance the beer and provide bitterness and hop flavor/aroma. Hops added during the beginning of the boil
were called “bittering” additions since the longer hops were boiled, the more bitterness they provided to the beer.
Hops added at the end of the boil were called “aroma” additions because these provided hop flavor and aroma
without as much bitterness.
Once the boil was completed, the wort was cooled and transferred to a fermentation tank. This was
essentially the end of the first step.
Step 2 was the fermentation process. Once yeast was added to the cooled wort, sugars were metabolized
into alcohol and carbon dioxide, and the product can be called beer for the first time. This process usually took 1-2
weeks. The style of beer and strain of beer affected how long fermentation took. This was an incredibly interesting
process and had a lot of factors that affected the end beer product. It essentially came down to yeast converting sugar
to alcohol, thus creating beer.
Once fermentation was finished, beer was transferred into what was called a “brite” tank. This was where
the beer became carbonated. CO2 was applied to the beer until a desirable level of carbonation was achieved. The
carbonation process took about 12 hours on average in a brite tank. Then the beer was transferred into kegs, cooled,
and made ready to be served.
BREWING AT BLACKROCKS
Blackrocks had about a 600-barrel beer capacity per year. Their major competition, the Vierling and Ore
Dock, had approximately 350- and 1200-barrel capacity, respectively. In the spring of 2013, Blackrocks bought an
old Coca-Cola bottling plant on Washington Street, about a mile from the Blackrocks retail outlet, with the prospect
of producing a bottled craft beer.
COMPETITION
From a broad perspective, craft beer was in competition with all beer; but in reality, craft beer like that
made at Blackrocks was in competition with two other craft brewers in the city – the Vierling and the Ore Dock. In
the general area, Jasper Ridge Brewery in Ishpeming, Michigan, a city about 15 miles west of Marquette,
represented nearby competition. Also, KBC in Houghton (90 miles north) was, to a degree, a competitor. They sold
craft bottled beer that was distributed in the area. Indirectly, Blackrocks also competed with the largest craft beer
company in the nation, Samuel Adams. According to Jim Kock in an interview with Eng (2013), there were about
2,400 microbrewers in the United States as of January 2013. Rolling Rock, Ambersteam, Killian’s Red, and Honey
Brown were some of the products produced. Literally, tens of thousands of other national, regional, and local
specialty beer were a form of competition. The interesting thing about these beers was that they had established
followers and were known brands of their respective brewers.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 109 The Clute Institute
FINANCIALS
Blackrocks Income Statement and Balance Sheet for 2012 appear in Figures 5 and 6.
Blackrocks Brewery Income Statement
January 1, 2012 – December 31, 2012
Percent of Net Sales
Sales (net) $ 328,906.26 100%
Cost of Goods Sold $ 85,491.55 26%
Gross Profit $ 243,414.71 74%
Total Expense $ 195,037.99
Net Ordinary Income $ 48,376.72
Net Other Income $ 529.77
Net Income $ 48,906.49
Figure 5: Blackrocks Brewery Income Statement
Source: Company Records, 2012
Blackrocks Brewery Balance Sheet
31 December 2012
Assets
Current Assets $ 6,790.58
Fixed Assets $ 253,422.05
Total Assets $ 260,212.63
Liabilities
Current Liabilities $ 17,594.05
Long-term Liabilities $ 92,654.11
Total Liabilities $ 110,248.16
Equity $ 149,964.47
Total Liabilities & Equity $ 260,212.63
Figure 6: Blackrocks Brewery Balance Sheet
Source: Company Records, 2012
GENERAL INFORMATION
Blackrocks did not advertise except for one ad in Brewers Guild when they first started business. They did,
however, get lots of word of mouth, Facebook, and Twitter activity. General labor was relatively inexpensive in the
$10 to $12 per hour range. Their brewers were all self-taught. They did not hold any certifications; but together, the
brewers had 20-25 years of home brewing experience. David believed that some formal schooling would add
knowledge to their brewing activity and should be considered in the future.
From a regulatory point of view, Blackrocks had to purchase a $50 license from the State of Michigan and
a Brewer’s Notice (bond) of $1,000 from the Feds. They also faced access, parking, and sanitary requirements of the
county and city.
Entry into this type of business was not significant. For $100, one could get into the hobby of beer making
and for about $170,000, get capacity up to 600 barrels per year, the volume Blackrocks produced as of February
201
3.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 110 The Clute Institute
Hops were purchased through a contract with a farmer in the Rock, Michigan, area. All other ingredient
prices were set by commodity markets (many items had world prices). David expressed some concern about this
since many grains were at all-time high prices.
The primary substitutes for beer were hard liquor, wine, and wine coolers. However, these markets were
somewhat separated. There were overlaps, but many consumers of wine, for example, did not consume beer (to any
extent) and visa-versa. But alcohol and its effects on the human body were present in all, and all were in demand and
replaced each other in a given setting.
Fun and good times were a significant part of what Blackrocks stood for. The pumpkin carving event was
typical of the environment Blackrocks tried to promote. One of the part-time employees had a few pumpkins
brought in during Halloween, and in no time everyone in the bar was drinking beer and carving pumpkins. The
competition was fierce and the camaraderie was significant. The Blackrocks’ atmosphere truly represented how
Andy and David described their business, “art mixed with science – it is creative, like jazz mixed with symphony.”
Andy and David were excited about their upcoming remodeling and the doubling of their business capacity.
However, they had to make some important decisions to secure the future of their business. They knew what they
had to do was their responsibility.
This case was prepared by Brian Gnauck, Claudia Hart and Larry Pagel of Northern Michigan University and is
intended to be used as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a
business situation.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Brian Gnauck is a professor of management at Northern Michigan University. He returned to the classroom in
2000 after serving 15 years as Dean of the Walker L. Cisler College of Business. He has been on the faculty of the
college since 1972. Prior to that he was assistant professor of logistic management at the School of Systems &
Logistics at the Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright Patterson AFB, Ohio. The school offered a master degree
in logistics management to U.S. Air Force officers and officers of allied nations of the United States. E-mail:
gnauck@nmu.edu
Claudia Hart is a professor of management at Northern Michigan University. She has been on the faculty of the
college since 1981 and earned her Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota in 1988. She teaches in the area of
managerial communication and training and development both at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Her
research interests include active learning in the university classroom, conducting communication audits in
organizations, and improving communication and teamwork through understanding personality profiles. E-mail:
clhart@nmu.edu (Corresponding author)
Larry Pagel is a professor of business education at Northern Michigan University. He has been on the faculty of the
college since 1997 and earned his Ph.D. from the University of North Dakota in 1986. Prior to that he taught at St.
Cloud State University and the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. He teaches primarily in the area of
communication. E-mail: lpagel@nmu.edu
REFERENCES
1. David, F. (2004). Strategic management. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Department of Numbers. Michigan Unemployment. Retrieved October 4, 2013 from
http://www.deptofnumbers.com/unemployment/michigan/
3. Eng, D. (2013, Apr 08). Samuel Adams’s beer revolutionary. Fortune, 167(5), 26.
4. Hill, C., & Jones, G. (2007). Strategic management. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
5. Hitt, M., Ireland, R., & Hoskisson, R. (2001). Strategic management competitiveness and globalization.
Mason, OH: South-Western.
mailto:gnauck@nmu.edu
mailto:clhart@nmu.edu
mailto:lpagel@nmu.edu
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 111 The Clute Institute
6. Mariott, S., & Glackin, C. (2010). Entrepreneurship: Starting and operating a small business. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Pearce, J., & Robinson, R. (2012). Strategic management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Porter, M. E. (1979, March). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 6.
9. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990, May). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business
Review, 68 (3), 2-15.
10. Walton, N. (2013). February unemployment in U.P. up a tad. Retrieved April 10, 2013 from the Public
Radio 90 WNMU-FM website: http://wnmufm.org/term/upper-peninsula-unemployment
11. Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix: A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Planning, 15(2), 6
1.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 112 The Clute Institute
TEACHING NOTE
Case Overview
Two longtime friends, Andy Langlois and David Manson, had a passion for making craft beer. After
working for about 18 years in the private sector, they started a retail craft beer “pub” in Marquette, Michigan. The
first 2½ years went well. They were on their way to forming a viable business when they started to express some
concerns and posed some management questions about their business.
Would the demand for beer and “craft beer” keep expanding? Should they develop a craft “brand” for
bottling and sell it for outside consumption? How could they better balance production with consumption?
They had developed a very “loose” organizational structure which seemed to work well given their size.
But would it be okay if they grew? Answers to these questions and the kind, timing, and nature of the decisions
Andy and David made at this stage of their business were important to their future
success.
Data Collection
In February 2013, Drs. Gnauck, Hart, and Pagel interviewed Andy Langlois, David Manson, and Steve Farr
(a part-time employee) of Blackrocks at their retail outlet in Marquette, Michigan. Additional phone and e-mail
communication gained further information and data for the case.
Learning Objectives
After analyzing this case, the students will be able to:
1) Identify the primary problems facing Blackrocks as of 2013.
2) Describe the external environment of Blackrocks.
3) Describe the internal environment of Blackrocks.
4) Identify Blackrocks’ capabilities and core competencies.
5) Identify Blackrocks’ strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
6) Develop specific management strategies which would further enhance the business and help them attain
their mission and goals.
Suggestions for Classroom Use
This case focused on the application of strategic management to a small business retail LLC. Blackrocks
had sales of $328,906 in 2012. Students will be able to employ the basic concepts of strategic management to tackle
the problems facing Blackrocks. By logically following the strategic management process, appropriate direction can
be provided to this small business enterprise. Thus, this case is best suited in an undergraduate strategic
management
class or a small business management class.
This teaching note focuses on ideas from Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson (2001), David (2004), and Pearce &
Robinson (2012). Given the small business and non-sophisticated nature of the business, students get engaged in the
case quickly. Since the case’s business model is not complex (selling craft beer at retail), students understand it
quickly and can focus on the problems facing the company.
The case demonstrated the need to prioritize problems and make good decisions.
Questions (Actions) and Question Answers
1. What were the primary problems facing Andy and David (Blackrocks) as of February 2013?
The business faced a number of problems that should be addressed to provide a solid foundation for future
success.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 113 The Clute Institute
1. A need to create a formal organizational structure for the business.
2. A need to create general job descriptions for all employees, part- and full-time.
3. Answer to the question, “Should they produce and bottle a beer for outside sales and wholesale it?”
4. The value of an advisory board (board of directors).
5. The role and value of staff and management development.
6. A plan for growth and a need for Andy and David to spend more time planning.
2. How can Andy and David develop specific strategies to deal with these 6 areas? Employ the strategic
management process. In order to accomplish this, four subordinate questions need to be answered.
a. What is (describe) the external environment of the firm? Pearce and Robinson (2012) include the
following when describing the external environment:
Remote Environment (Global and Domestic):
*Economic
*Social
*Technological
*Demographic
*Political/Legal
Industry Environment (Global and Domestic):
*Entry Barriers
*Supplier Power
*Buyer Power
*Substitute Availability
*Competitive Rivalry
*Complementors
Operating Environment (Global and Domestic):
*Competitors
*Creditors
*Customers
*Labor
*Suppliers
Blackrocks’ remote environment can be described as follows:
Economic: The economy of the local community was robust. Marquette, Michigan was an island of
relative prosperity in a sea of decline. The City of Marquette and its immediate surroundings with the
hospital (employment of about 2,000 and 200 physicians), the university (employment of about 1,000
and 9,500 students), the mines (employment of about 1,800), and gambling (employment of about
1,500) all supported an economy that represented higher incomes and enhanced discretionary
spending. Aspects of the national economy were also relatively robust. The stock market hit an all-time
high in September 2013. Even though the State of Michigan’s unemployment rate and that of the
Upper Peninsula of Michigan were high, the local Marquette communities’ environment was solid for
craft beer as of February 2013.
Social: Students were, and will always be, attracted to alcohol beverages in general and beer
specifically. A university town always has a demand for entertainment. University students seek out
excitement and good times. Also, craft beer had expanded in the marketplace over the last 15 years.
Craft beer represented about 9.1 percent of total beer revenue as of 2013.
Technological: Beer making had not changed much since it was first invented thousands of years ago.
Yes, the big brewers all had significant technology, but the small craft brewers largely followed the
traditional process.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 114 The Clute Institute
Demographic: Blackrocks targeted customers of all ages 21 and over. While a large percentage were
college students over 21, the pub attracted a good many 30, 40, 50, and 60 year olds. Because
Marquette, Michigan, was a college town, it had a good supply of people willing to provide patronage
to Blackrocks. It also had a large supply of professionals (medical community and university) who had
enhanced disposable income.
Political/Legal: A micro-brewer’s license costs $50. This was required by the State of Michigan, and a
Brewer’s Notice ($1,000) bond was required by the federal government. Also, Blackrocks faced
county regulations in terms of access to the building and parking and regulations set by the City of
Marquette.
Blackrocks’ industry environment can be best described using M. E. Porter’s Five Forces Model (Porter,
1979) for Competitive Strategy:
Threat of Entrance: The capital investment to get into the retail pub business amounts to a fair amount
of dollars in absolute terms, but in relative context, this type of business was inexpensive to enter. The
Ore Dock entered the craft beer business after Blackrocks, and the Vierling preceded it. In general,
entrance was not difficult.
Bargaining Power/Suppliers: Blackrocks purchased hops through a pre-purchased set price agreement
with farmers in the Rock, Michigan area. They tended to use local hops because the price of other hops
was substantially higher. In the purchase of hops there was balanced power between the farmer and
Blackrocks. In regard to grains and most of the other products, a national or world price prevailed. The
futures market set the price for these items. Therefore, Blackrocks was a price taker.
Bargaining Power/Buyers: For the primary market, demand for beer was relatively inelastic. Twenty-
one year olds were willing to pay to get the beer they wanted. Also, Blackrocks was on the bottom end
of pricing compared to their major competitors. Buyers had lots of power.
Substitutes: The primary substitute for Blackrocks craft beer was hard liquor, wine, and wine coolers.
If someone wanted to get high or drunk, a product was available to do so.
Competitive Rivalry: There was competitive rivalry between the Vierling, Ore Dock, and Blackrocks,
but Blackrocks was in general a lower priced beer. Each company knew the other was in town.
Complementors: The law allowing the drinking of alcohol beverages at 21 was a major complementor
to Blackrocks’ business. Also, the university and its 2,000-3,000 students who were 21 and older were
a ready market for Blackrocks. The State of Michigan and the federal government’s licenses and
bonding policies facilitated the existence of Blackrocks. As of 2013, the United States was a long ways
away from moving toward prohibition.
Blackrocks’ operating environment can be described as follows:
Competitors: The primary competitors were the Vierling and the Ore Dock.
Customers: The citizenry of the City of Marquette and the transient students of the university were the
primary customer base as of 2013. Blackrocks had received a warm welcome from these customers
since it opened. There was a good relationship between the company and its customers.
Credit: Blackrocks had a banking relationship with a local bank in Marquette, Michigan. The company
had been successful to date. The business had a good working relationship with this bank.
Labor: There seemed to be an adequate supply of labor both in terms of price and technological
qualifications. The company management did realize, however, that investments in further training
could expand the technological knowledge of its brewers. This was also true of top management.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 115 The Clute Institute
b. What is (describe) the internal environment of the firm? The internal environment of the firm is best
expressed by Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson (2001). Their framework is presented in Figure 7.
Figure 7: Components of Internal Analysis
Source: Adapted from Hitt, Ireland, & Hoskisson, 2001
Tangible resources: Blackrocks had their retail establishment at 424 N. Third Street, Marquette,
Michigan. This location also held the brewing equipment. They had purchased an old Coca-Cola
building for additional brewing capacity.
Intangible resources: Andy Langlois and David Manson had about 18 years of experience in business
as sales persons and in managerial roles. Andy and David were friends and seemed to get along well
with each other. They were informally co-CEOs. Andrew Reeves was the head brewer and Chris
Chutte was a bartender and a brewer.
c. What are the capabilities and core competencies of the firm?
Capabilities: According to Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson (2001), “capabilities are the firm’s capacity to
develop resources that have purposely been integrated to achieve a desired end state” (p. 108). These
capabilities develop over time and represent the complex interaction of tangible and intangible
(human) resources. Most of these capabilities are housed in the people of an organization. The way
people interact, for example, can create capabilities. It is the people who are working with other people
or people working with non-human resources that create capabilities. Capabilities are what companies
do well. They are not facts. Instead, they are things companies do. Common examples include research
and development, marketing, logistics, and accounting.
Resources
–Tangible
–Intangible
Capabilities
Core Competencies
Criteria for Core Competencies
–Valuable
–Rare
–Costly to imitate
–Nonsubstitutable
Competitive Advantage
Strategic Competitiveness
Outsource
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 116 The Clute Institute
The following represent the capabilities of Blackrocks:
Retail craft beer marketing: In the 2½ years Blackrocks had been in business, they had developed a
successful business model. Their “fun and good times” and “top-quality craft beer” were in demand
from a customer perspective. They had built a lasting relationship with customers. Whether it was
because of pumpkin carving, beer mugs, or just top-quality craft beer, they had created an environment
attractive to repeat purchase.
Dedicated top management: Andy and David devoted 65+ hours a week in the business. Their
everyday presence was an integral part of the business’s success. They tended to think alike and had
good communication skills.
Core competencies: The concept of core competencies was first described by Prahalad and Hamel
(1990) in their HBR article entitled, “Core Competencies of the Firm.” The term, core competencies,
varies by author. Hill and Jones (2007), for example, in their Strategic Management text use the
phrase, distinctive competencies (p. 77). Basically, capabilities that meet four criteria (rare, valuable,
costly to imitate, and non-substitutable) become core competencies of the firm and were its strengths.
If capabilities of a firm are what it does well, then core competencies are the things they do very well.
Blackrocks had two core competencies. Both retail craft beer marketing and a dedicated top
management were core competencies or strengths of Blackrocks.
d. What are (describe) Blackrocks’ strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats?
Strengths: from above
Retail craft beer marketing
Dedicated top management
Weaknesses: these are the internal things the company does not do well.
No job descriptions
No formal reporting lines
Weak planning and no advice and counsel
Opportunities
A branded craft beer for
Blackrocks?
Wholesaling of a branded beer?
Growth in market share?
Threats
The general demand for craft beer (Marquette, Michigan)
Competition
Vierling
Ore Dock
Retail craft beer (mostly bottled)
Bottled/canned beer (in general)
3. What are (describe) the strengths/opportunities (SO) strategies, weaknesses/opportunities (WO) strategies,
strengths/threats (ST) strategies, weaknesses/threats (WT) strategies for Blackrocks?
SWOT Matrix
The analytical tool of the SWOT Matrix (David, 2004) evolves from the Tows Matrix (Weihrich, 1982).
This is an important matching tool that helps managers develop four types of strategies: SO
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 117 The Clute Institute
(strengths/opportunities) strategy, WO (weaknesses/opportunities) strategy, ST (strengths/threats) strategy,
and WT (weaknesses/threats) strategy (see Table 1). For the SWOT Matrix applied to Blackrocks for the
year 2013, see Table 2. The SWOT Matrix helps develop the appropriate strategies that can be employed.
As shown in Table 2, seven strategies seem to fall out of the SWOT Matrix for Blackrocks.
Table 1: The SWOT Matrix Structure
Strengths – S
1.
2.
3.
4.
Weaknesses – W
1.
2.
3.
4.
Opportunities – O
1.
2.
3.
4.
SO Strategies
Use strength to take advantage of
opportunities
WO Strategies
Overcome weaknesses by taking
advantage of opportunities
Threats – T
1.
2.
3.
4.
ST Strategies
Use strengths to avoid threats
WT Strategies
Minimize weaknesses and avoid threats
Source: David, 2004, p. 204
Table 2: The SWOT Matrix Structure for Blackrocks, February 2013
Strengths
1. retail craft beer marketing
2. dedicated, hardworking top
management
Weaknesses
1. no job descriptions
2. no formal reporting lines
3. weak planning and no advice and counsel
Opportunities
1. a “branded” craft beer from
Blackrocks?
2. wholesaling a “branded” beer
3. growth in market share
SO Strategies
1. S1,O1 – investigate the
development of a “brand” that
represents the brewer Blackrocks
2. S2, O2 – Andy and David needed
to investigate the feasibility of
finding a wholesaler to take on their
brand or wholesale it themselves.
WO Strategies
1. W1,O3 – write formal job descriptions for
all employees – full- and part-time
2. W2,O3 – create a formal organizational
chart; formally recognize the co-CEO
relationship
3. W3,O3 – develop a 3-year strategic plan
4. W3, O4 – create a business advisory council
for top management. (4 meetings per year)
Threats
1. general demand for beer
2. competition
A. Vierling
B. Ore Dock
C. Retail
3. specialty beer
4. bottled and canned beer in
general
ST Strategies
1. S2, T2 – on a yearly basis monitor
the external and internal environment
of the firm.
WT Strategies
None
Strategy One: S1/O1: Investigate the development of a brand that represents “Blackrocks.” Blackrocks
prides itself on the idea of variety – new and different beer every few weeks. This policy leaves it up to the
buyers to decide which beer they like best. Even though mass customization and lean production have
come a long way, it is not feasible to produce and bottle 10 or 12 beers for a company like Blackrocks.
Therefore, Blackrocks must choose the one or two beer that best represent the brewer “Blackrocks.”
Planning for the production of a given beer requires the design of a label (Blackrocks logo, etc.) and a
bottle or can. It also requires the coordination of production with demand. The decision to produce a beer
of choice requires a company to pay close attention to production capacity.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 118 The Clute Institute
What beer to make is an integral part of this strategy. Blackrocks could use one of its strengths, “retail craft
beer marketing,” to develop the beer of choice. For example, for 3 or 4 months Blackrocks could have a
contest – let the customer decide which beer is best. What should Blackrocks represent and what should the
beer be named were important questions to answer.
Attention must be given to the production process. Most likely, production runs at first or even in the long
run would be filled by “outsourcing.” If absolute control were required, this strategy would be strategic in
nature and require a significant capital investment in production, bottling facilities, and marketing. This
strategy would be investigatory at this point.
Strategy Two: S2/O2: Investigate the feasibility of a wholesaler to take on this brand. At first this would
require a local or regional wholesaler who would take on the brewer Blackrocks. Issues like the wholesale
and retail price point for the beer would be important. The reach of the brand named Blackrocks would also
be important. This discussion would require some work. It may be that the brand would have to be
established locally at first. The brand would always be part of Blackrocks’ venue. The market needs to
identify the “brand.” That is, its taste, its flavor, and its aroma as representing the brewer, Blackrocks. This
strategy needs to be carefully planned regarding production and distribution as well as retail pricing points
for the beer. This strategy also is investigatory in nature.
Strategy Three: S2/T2: On a yearly basis, produce a report that describes the external and internal
environment of the firm. Every two years, review the company’s SWOT (strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats). Make sure it is constantly up to date. Given the structure of Blackrocks at this
time, it should be done by the company’s co-owners. This strategy would require very little in the form of
capital investment.
Strategy Four: W1/O3: Write formal job descriptions for all employees – full- and part-time. Andy and
David would do this best. It would be interesting for each of them to do it on their own and then compare
the descriptions. Do the lists agree or are there differences? If the latter prevails, then the owners should
work out the details and present the final form to the employees. Andy and David should also have formal
written job descriptions.
They must understand that they are co-CEOs. This is a somewhat uncommon form of business leadership,
but it is an acceptable form used in businesses across the United States today. If job activity is allocated
appropriately between the two business leaders, it can work well. To know who will handle what is
important because it leaves nothing to “fall through the cracks.” It also eliminates the problem of two
bosses for subordinates. This strategy did not require significant capital investment.
Strategy Five: W2/O3: Create a formal organizational chart. For a company of this size, this strategy is
easily executed. Andy and David should create the form first and consolidate it with their respective ideas
folded together. They needed to work out any conflicts.
In the long run, the organizational chart should be shared with employees. Who handles finances and
accounting? How is marketing executed? Where does production fit into the business? Who reports to
whom? No capital was required to execute this strategy.
Strategy Six: W3/O3: Develop a 3-year (ongoing) strategic plan for the business. This is not a capital
intensive strategy, but it would require Andy and David to look at their mission statement and determine
where they want to be in the next 3 years. They need to set out their goals which, when achieved, will meet
their mission.
Questions should be considered such as what return on invested capital do we want in 2013, 2014, and
2015? What do we have to do to achieve these numbers? How much do we need to reinvest in the business
each year to keep it competitive? Appendix 1 represents a broad outline for achieving an ongoing 3-year
business plan.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 119 The Clute Institute
Strategy Seven: W3/O4: Create a business advisory board. Blackrocks is at a critical point in their business.
Its products have had consumer acceptance. The company to date is profitable and each major owner is
receiving a salary.
A group of dedicated business people with the right kind of experience could aid Andy and David
immensely. SCORE might be a source for some of these people. Andy and David have knowledge of the
business so they might be able to identify other individuals. What’s important is to find four or five
dedicated people who have solid experience running successful and profitable businesses. The key question
would be to get them to volunteer their time at first, and in the long run, provide a nominal stipend for their
advice. The advisory board should rotate on a three- or four-year term in the long run. This strategy
represents a nominal capital investment.
EPILOGUE
Andy and David produced their first retail beer for sale in September 2013.
Journal of Business Case Studies – Second Quarter 2014 Volume 10, Number 2
Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 120 The Clute Institute
APPENDIX 1
Ongoing Business Plan
(Mariott & Glackin, 2010, p. 32)
A business plan helps explain your business idea and how that idea will be implemented. Your business
plan will help you determine whether your business is viable before the business start-up, and it forces you to
realistically analyze opportunities and markets before you secure the necessary capital.
The common elements to a business plan are as follows:
Mission, vision, and culture
Company description
Opportunity analysis and research
Marketing strategy and plan
Management and operations
Financial analysis and projections
Funding request and exit strategy
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read moreOur specialists are always online to help you! We are available 24/7 via live chat, WhatsApp, and phone to answer questions, correct mistakes, or just address your academic fears.
See our T&Cs