I want someone to write an 2000 words about “Is the global economy a cause for peace or conflict?” I want it with five sources

5PIR007WGlobalSecurityHandbook2021-20229-17
 

I want someone to write an 2000 words about “Is the global economy a cause for peace or conflict?” 

I want it with five sources 

DPIR Essay Rubric

First (70-100) 2:1 (60-69) 2:2 (50-59) 3rd (40-49) Fail (0-39)
Knowledge
and
understanding
of key
theories,
concepts, and
sources

20% Confident
engagement with
relevant theories,
concepts, and
sources which
demonstrates an
excellent
understanding.
Identifies links
between separate
themes. Identifies
wide range of
appropriate sources.

A good grasp of
relevant theories,
concepts, and
sources covered
on the module.
Identifies a range
of appropriate
sources. Evidence
of a good level of
research.

Reasonable grasp
of relevant theories,
concepts, and
sources covered on
the module but
lacks some detail
and might display
minor errors.
Engages with key
readings but not in
depth. Relatively
little research.

Insufficient
engagement with
relevant theories,
concepts, and
sources covered on
the module.
Significant errors
and gaps in
knowledge and
understanding.
Relies on some
poor quality
sources.

Poor grasp of
relevant theories,
concepts, and
sources covered on
the module. Little to
no use of appropriate
sources. Significant
errors and gaps in
knowledge and
understanding. Relies
heavily on poor
quality sources.

Depth of
critical
analysis and
evaluation

20% Identifies main
theoretical points
and arguments,
along with
underlying
assumptions.
Subjects texts and
arguments to
confident, detailed
analysis and
evaluation.

Identifies main
theoretical points
and arguments.
Subjects them to
careful analysis
and evaluation.

Identifies some
important
theoretical points
and arguments but
analysis and
evaluation lack
depth. Likely to be
too descriptive.

Neglects some
important points or
arguments. Analysis
or evaluation is
largely absent or
incoherent. Almost
entirely descriptive.

Purely descriptive
writing or with no
comprehensible
attempt at relevant
analysis or
evaluation.

Clarity of
argument

20% Provides a clear
answer to the
question. Argument
is persuasive, and
presented clearly
and logically, with
excellent evidence
and justification
provided.

Provides a clear
answer to the
question. Logic of
argument is
mostly clear, with
appropriate
evidence and
justification
provided.

Addresses the
question but may
lack focus.
Argument
sometimes weak or
unclear. Evidence
and justification not
always provided.

Tenuous connection
to the question.
Argument is not
supported with
sufficient evidence
and justification
and/or is unclear.

Ignores the question.
Argument is either
absent, entirely
irrelevant, or not
discernible.

Logic and
clarity of
structure

20% Carefully planned.
Logical structure
allows argument to
develop effectively.
Writing
demonstrates
excellent
signposting.

Well-planned.
Structure is clear
and effective.
Writing
demonstrates
good signposting.

Evidence of limited
planning. Structure
is reasonably clear
but not always
effective. Writing
uses some
signposting.

Appears unplanned.
Structure is unclear
and often lacks
logic. Writing uses
very little
signposting.

Structure is
haphazard, illogical,
or absent. Writing
does not use
signposting.

Quality of
writing
(grammar,
punctuation)
and
referencing

20% Very few errors.
Style is clear and
engaging. Sentence
structure is
excellent.
Referencing and
bibliography are
thorough and
accurate. Quotes
and paraphrased
material are well
incorporated into the
text.

Few errors of
grammar or
punctuation.
Writing is clear
and easy to
follow. Sentence
structure is very
good. Referencing
and bibliography
are thorough and
mostly accurate.
Quotes and
paraphrased
material are
mostly well
incorporated into
the text.

Some errors of
grammar or
punctuation. Writing
occasionally lacks
clarity. Sentence
structure is
sometimes
incorrect.
Referencing and
bibliography might
not be accurate or
sufficiently
thorough. Quotes
and paraphrased
material are not
always well
incorporated.

Consistent and
serious errors of
grammar or
punctuation. Writing
is hard to follow.
Referencing and
bibliography are
mostly inaccurate or
inadequate. Quotes
and paraphrased
material are not well
incorporated into
the text.

Consistent and
serious errors of
grammar or
punctuation which
make the essay hard
to understand.
Referencing and
bibliography are
absent, inadequate,
and/or inaccurate. If
plagiarised material is
in evidence, this will
be reported to the
Student Regulations
Team.