Assignment : Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA)

Topic: Perform a LOPA (Layers of Protection Analysis) of your local living area or work location. Remember to get permission from security. 

Instructions: Please download the Assignment 7 Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) template (MS Word) PFA , which is already in APA 7 format, using size 12 Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, TOC, Headings and Reference page. If you insert images or tables in your report make sure you label them appropriately according to APA.

Need Plagiarism report as well.

Assignment 3: Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) 1

Assignment 3: Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA)

Your Name

School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of the Cumberlands

ISOL634 Physical Security

Dr. Name of your Instructor

Current Date

Table of Contents
What Could Happen? (Note: This H1 required) 4
Threat 1 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 4
Threat 2 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 4
Threat 3 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 4
Threat n from Outside (optional) 4
Threat 1 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 4
Threat 2 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 4
Threat 3 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 4
Threat n from Inside (optional) 4
Frequency of Potential Threats (Note: This H1 required) 5
Frequency of Threat 1 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 5
Frequency of Threat 2 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 5
Frequency of Threat 3 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 5
Frequency of Threat n from Outside (optional) 5
Frequency of Threat 1 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 5
Frequency of Threat 2 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 5
Frequency of Threat 3 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat) 5
Frequency of Threat n from Inside (optional) 5
How Effective are the Layers of Protection (Note: This H1 required) 6
Effectiveness of Layer 1 against Threats from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual layer) 6
Effectiveness of Layer 2 against Threats from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual layer) 6
Effectiveness of Layer 3 against Threats from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual layer) 6
Effectiveness of Layer n against Threats from Outside (Note: optional) 6
Effectiveness of Layer 1 against Threats from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual layer) 6
Effectiveness of Layer 2 against Threats from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual layer) 6
Effectiveness of Layer 3 against Threats from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual layer) 6
Effectiveness of Layer n against Threats from Inside (Note: optional) 6
How Tolerable are the Mitigation Layers (Note: This H1 required) 7
Outside Layers of Protection Tolerability (Note: H2 required with actual layer) 7
Inside Layers of Protection Tolerability (Note: H2 required with actual layer) 7
References 8

Your paper starts here with the first paragraph indented. Start by writing a brief description of your approach to completing the assignment. (Note: Each Heading should have at least 2 properly formatted paragraphs and each paragraph should have at least 3 properly formatted sentences. Also, please delete all the notes before submitting).

What Could Happen? (Note: This H1 required)

Start typing here.

Threat 1 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Threat 2 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Threat 3 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Threat n from Outside (optional)

Start typing here.

Threat 1 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Threat 2 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Threat 3 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Threat n from Inside (optional)

Start typing here.

Frequency of Potential Threats (Note: This H1 required)

Start typing here.

Frequency of Threat 1 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Frequency of Threat 2 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Frequency of Threat 3 from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Frequency of Threat n from Outside (optional)

Start typing here.

Frequency of Threat 1 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Frequency of Threat 2 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Frequency of Threat 3 from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual threat)

Start typing here.

Frequency of Threat n from Inside (optional)

Start typing here.

How Effective are the Layers of Protection (Note: This H1 required)

Start typing here.

Effectiveness of Layer 1 against Threats from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual layer)

Start typing here.

Effectiveness of Layer 2 against Threats from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual layer)

Start typing here.

Effectiveness of Layer 3 against Threats from Outside (Note: H2 required with actual layer)

Start typing here.

Effectiveness of Layer n against Threats from Outside (Note: optional)

Start typing here.

Effectiveness of Layer 1 against Threats from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual layer)

Start typing here.

Effectiveness of Layer 2 against Threats from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual layer)

Start typing here.

Effectiveness of Layer 3 against Threats from Inside (Note: H2 required with actual layer)

Start typing here.

Effectiveness of Layer n against Threats from Inside (Note: optional)

Start typing here.

How Tolerable are the Mitigation Layers (Note: This H1 required)

Start typing here.

Outside Layers of Protection Tolerability (Note: H2 required with actual layer)

Start typing here. (Note: each layer should be addressed)

Inside Layers of Protection Tolerability (Note: H2 required with actual layer)

Start typing here. (Note: each layer should be addressed)

References
There are no sources in the current document.

8/16/22, 1:1

7

PM Originality Report

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/mdb-sa-BB5a31b16bb2c48/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=00f9c873-e639-4466-aa9e-569da4e84… 1/

10

%8

6

%

2

%2

SafeAssign Originality Report
Summer 2022 – Physical Security (ISOL-634-B02) – Second Bi-Term • Assignment 3: Apply the LOPA (Levels of Protection Analysis) Assess…

%89Total Score: High risk
Submission UUID: c3af1461-e0f6-a5a0-42d5-5983bd86969

4

Total Number of Reports

1

Highest Match

89 %
SharathDasari_Assignment_7_LOPA_Asse…

Average Match

89 %
Submitted on

08/16/22
12:52 PM EDT

Average Word Count

1,27

9

Highest: SharathDasari_Assignment_7_L…

%89Attachment 1

Institutional database (11)

Student paper

Student paper

Student paper

Student paper Student paper Student paper
Student paper Student paper Student paper
Student paper Student paper

Global database (1)

Student paper

Internet (2)

beara3d process-improvement-institute

Top sources (3)

Excluded sources (0)

Word Count: 1,279
SharathDasari_Assignment_7_LOPA_Assessment x

6 1

3

9 4

5

10 8

7

11 2

12

14

13

6 Student paper 1 Student paper 3 Student paper

Running Head: LOPA 1

LOPA 8

Assignment 3: Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) Sharath Kumar Dasari

School of Computer and Information Sciences, University of the Cumberlands

08/16/2022

Table of Contents

What Could Happen 3

Industry Accidents 3

Falls 3

1
2
1
3

ISOL634 Physical Security

xx.xx

8/16/22, 1:17 PM Originality Report

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/mdb-sa-BB5a31b16bb2c48/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=00f9c873-e639-4466-aa9e-569da4e84… 2/10

Fire 3

Frequency of Potential Threats 3

Frequency of industrial incidents 3

Frequency of fall 4

Frequency of Fires 4

Effectiveness of Layers of Protection. 4

Effectiveness of Deterrence. 4

Effectiveness of Access Control. 5

Effectiveness of Detection 5

Effectiveness of Identification

5

Protective layer against inside threats 5

Effectiveness of Deterrence 5

Effectiveness of Access control 6

Effectiveness of Detection 6

Effectiveness of Identification. 6

Outside Layers of Protection Tolerability 6

Inside Layers of Protection Tolerability 6

Reference 8

What Could Happen

Layers of Protection Analysis examined the risks demonstrated by various incidents and associated value to the firm’s safety and profitability. Risk tolerance is some-
times confirmed by the severity and proportion of severe episodes. LOPA combines two risk variables within the same context, together with possibilities and conse-
quences, to identify layers of protection. The risks posed by various incidents were evaluated based on their importance to the firm and associated value to

overall safety and economics. Risk tolerance is often determined by the severity and proportion of severe incidents. LOPA combines two risk indicators inside the
same context with possibilities and repercussions to detect separate events and assess risks in this context (Pawolocki,2021). The occurrence of probability has only a
modest connection to the intensity of any incident. It hence has the least potential to generate a high-consequence situation. the outcome of an event that has

the most significance for the severity of any event and hence has the most significant potential to cause a high-consequence scenario and is thus deemed to be a high
chance”. Industry Accidents

Human-made, industrial mishaps can pose critical dangers. Those eventual blasts, chemical leaks. Damage to the facility can come from a blast brought about by

deflagration, explosion and pressure impact. Chemical facilities or fuel retention facilities chemical plants can bring about such incidents. Falls

Injuries can happen because of falls brought about by dangerous stairs and floors, wet floors and surfaces, dissipated objects. More than 40 % of home in-

juries happen because of falls, and beyond what 33% of those wounds can wind up in death. Falls fundamentally affect the elderly and kids. Fire

Flames can happen because of different factors like candles, unattended irons, burners, broilers. The most well-known areas where flames emerge would

be kitchens, like unattended cooking. Bedrooms are normal areas for electrical fires because of flawed wiring, lighting, strings and warmers electric covers.

Living rooms, warming gear, stacks, chimneys, space radiators can cause fires. Frequency of Potential Threats

Frequency of industrial incidents

Industry incidents are assessed to be unlikely in view of the scale that happens every 1000 years with serious risk. Frequency of fall

The recurrence of threats from inside because of falls is assessed as Highly Probable because of the way that they happen on different occasions in a year, and

results are assessed as extreme on the grounds that the result might be even death. Frequency of Fires

The recurrence of threats because of flames is assessed to be Highly Probable in light of the scale that one happens consistently. The outcomes brought

about by fire are assessed as significant dangers. Effectiveness of Layers of Protection. Layers of protection ought to be independent to be effective.

Defensive layers are viewed as isolated series of components related with the process and design. The huge layers of protection incorporate prevention, access

control, discovery, and identification. Effectiveness of Deterrence. Deterrence goes from basically raising high level fences and doors to keep people and differ-

ent threats from getting to the organization’s structures. House redesigns should be possible by raising the house on braces to increase flood level, introducing

establishment vents or aggregate siphons, ideally with the battery on the off chance that the blackout occurs. Coatings and sealants ought to be applied to walls,

entryways, windows for fixing any leaks water will actually want to go through. Outlets, switches ought to be introduced sufficiently high that isn’t harmed if

there should be an incident of floods. Effectiveness of Access Control. The access control layer will guarantee that only people with legitimate credentials can get

to the building and the data inside. Access control is the best suit to control outside threats like criminals who might need to get to the structure. Effectiveness of

Detection

4
5
6
6
6
7
6
5
6
3

8

1
9
9
4
1

4 1

4 1
4 1
4
5
10
3
6

3 1

6 1

1 3

5
6
1
4
1
6
7

8/16/22, 1:17 PM Originality Report

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/mdb-sa-BB5a31b16bb2c48/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=00f9c873-e639-4466-aa9e-569da4e84… 3/10

Source Matches (63)

Student paper 90%

Student paper 63%

Student paper 88%

In situations where access control has been compromised, detection frameworks can be relied upon to cab the impacts. The detection control layer is addition-

ally valuable in cabbing threats like floods, flames, and carbon monoxide that won’t be quickly access controlled.

6

Some of the actions to avoid industry incidents could be to consistently assessing the establishments. Employees ought to be trained as well as supervised.

Effectiveness of Identification

ID is the last layer of protection and is used to light the main driver of the threats or identify the threats’ culprits. Identifications go far to guarantee that every-

one and items found inside the organization actually needs to be there. Protective layer against inside threats

Effectiveness of Deterrence

The deterrence control layer probably won’t be exceptionally valuable to keep threats from inside the structure. Notwithstanding, successful strategies to alleviate the
risk from falls is have joined deck, appropriate lighting, safety entryways for pets and little kids.

Any wet surfaces ought to be cleaned and dry

. Outside

stairs ought to likewise be kept liberated from garbage, ice, snow. Mats ought to be secured, and surfaces taped to make them less dangerous.

Washrooms, smooth surfaces ought to be covered with mats. Effectiveness of Access control

Access control plays a huge role in offering protection against insider threats. The best type of access control against inside threats is security key locks and

unique fingerprint locks. This kind of access control will assist with installing security to rooms and digital data centers to permitted people. Effectiveness of

Detection

Detection is critical to a portion of inside threats that are not effectively access controlled. It is best used in controlling inside threats like flames. Effectiveness of

Identification. The identification proof layer of security is so successful in cabbing inside dangers. Recognizable proof can be used to relieve robbery of the business’
computerized data. ID will assist with guaranteeing individuals who access data in the organization are perceived to forestall leaks and robbery. Outside Layers

of Protection Tolerability

Risks are weighted against organizations’ risk resistance principles. In the event that it is resolved that risk isn’t acceptable, extra security and control layers are

suggested. Every one of inside-outside alleviation layers is thought of as passable. Inside Layers of Protection Tolerability

Additionally, every one of the proposed inside layers of protection is viewed as okay. LOPA was led by distinguishing the probability of the multitude of perceived

risks, subjectively communicating their seriousness. LOPA checked out at various situations and setting off events. A protection layer incorporates crisis reaction,

actual security, control frameworks, and process design.

Reference

CCPS. (2018). Guidelines for initiating events and independent protection layers in layer of protection analysis. John Wiley & Sons. Dowell, A. M. (2019).

Simplified risk analysis — Layer of protection analysis (LOPA). Preiss, R. (2020).

Layer of protection analysis (LOPA) for risk-based evaluation of scenarios:

Application guideline for the analysis of process-based scenarios for risk assessment of the technical installations in the process industry. Pawolocki, F. J. (2021).

Layer of protection analysis as auxiliary technique in process safety incident investigations. Process Safety Progress, 40(S1). doi:10.1002/prs.12286

6
6
1 3
1 3
6
6
7
6
3
1
8
3
1

12 13

14

9
1
Student paper

Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) Sharath Kumar Dasari School of Computer and
Information Sciences, University of the Cumberlands ISOL634 Physical Security Dr.

Original source

Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) School of Computer and Information Sciences,
University of the Cumberlands ISOL634 Physical Security Dr

2
Student paper

08/16/2022

Original source

08/15/2022

1
Student paper

Table of Contents What Could Happen

3

Original source
Table of Contents

What Could Happen

8/16/22, 1:17 PM Originality Report

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/mdb-sa-BB5a31b16bb2c48/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=00f9c873-e639-4466-aa9e-569da4e84… 4/10

Student paper 70%

Student paper 84%

Student paper 84%

Student paper 83%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 78%

Student paper 82%

Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
3
Student paper

Industry Accidents 3

Original source

Threat 3 from Outside – Industry Accidents

4
Student paper

Frequency of Potential Threats 3

Original source

Frequency of Potential Threats

5
Student paper

Frequency of industrial incidents 3

Original source

Frequency of Industrial incidents

6
Student paper

Frequency of Fires 4

Effectiveness of Layers of Protection.

Original source

Frequency of Fires 6

Effectiveness of Layers of Protection

6
Student paper

Effectiveness of Deterrence.

Original source

Effectiveness of Deterrence

6
Student paper

Effectiveness of Access Control.

Original source

Effectiveness of Access Control

7
Student paper

Effectiveness of Detection 5

Original source

Effectiveness of Detection

6
Student paper

Effectiveness of Identification 5 Protective layer against inside threats 5 Effectiveness of
Deterrence 5

Original source

Effectiveness of Identification Protective layer against inside threats Effectiveness of
Deterrence

5
Student paper

Effectiveness of Access control 6 Effectiveness of Detection 6

Original source

Effectiveness of Access control 6 Effectiveness of detection 6

6
Student paper

Effectiveness of Identification.

Original source
Effectiveness of Identification

8/16/22, 1:17 PM Originality Report

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/mdb-sa-BB5a31b16bb2c48/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=00f9c873-e639-4466-aa9e-569da4e84… 5/10

Student paper 87%

Student paper 87%
Student paper 100%

Student paper 73%

Student paper 68%

Student paper 76%

Student paper 70%

Student paper 69%

3
Student paper

Outside Layers of Protection Tolerability 6

Original source

Outside Layers of Protection Tolerability

8
Student paper

Inside Layers of Protection Tolerability 6

Original source

Inside Layers of Protection Tolerability

1
Student paper
What Could Happen
Original source
What Could Happen
9
Student paper

The risks posed by various incidents were evaluated based on their importance to the
firm and associated value to overall safety and economics. Risk tolerance is often deter-
mined by the severity and proportion of severe incidents. LOPA combines two risk indica-
tors inside the same context with possibilities and repercussions to detect separate
events and assess risks in this context (Pawolocki,2021).

Original source

Layers of Protection Analysis evaluated the risks posed by various accidents based on
their importance to the firm and associated value to the overall safety and the economics
The severity and proportion of severe incidents are usually used to determine risk toler-
ance LOPA combines two risk factors in the same context, along with probabilities and
consequences, to detect different events inside a context and estimate risks in that
context

9
Student paper

the outcome of an event that has the most significance for the severity of any event and
hence has the most significant potential to cause a high-consequence scenario and is
thus deemed to be a high chance”.

Original source

The consequences of an occurrence that has the most relevance for the severity of any
event, and hence has the tremendous potential to cause a high-consequence scenario,
and is thus regarded as a “high likelihood (Pawolocki,2021)

4
Student paper

Damage to the facility can come from a blast brought about by deflagration, explosion
and pressure impact.

Original source

Harm to the office can come from a blast brought about by deflagration, explosion, and
pressure sway

1
Student paper

Chemical facilities or fuel retention facilities chemical plants can bring about such
incidents.

Original source

Chemical facilities or fuel retention facilities chemical plants can be likely to cause those
events

4
Student paper

Injuries can happen because of falls brought about by dangerous stairs and floors, wet
floors and surfaces, dissipated objects.

Original source

Wounds can happen because of falls brought about by tricky steps and floors, wet t floors
and surfaces, dissipated items (Edwards 2020)

8/16/22, 1:17 PM Originality Report

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/mdb-sa-BB5a31b16bb2c48/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=00f9c873-e639-4466-aa9e-569da4e84… 6/10

Student paper 93%

Student paper 90%

Student paper 91%

Student paper 79%

Student paper 81%

Student paper 100%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 70%

Student paper 86%

1
Student paper

More than 40 % of home injuries happen because of falls, and beyond what 33% of those
wounds can wind up in death.

Original source

More than 40 % of home wounds happen because of falls, and beyond what 33% of those
wounds can wind up in death

4
Student paper

Flames can happen because of different factors like candles, unattended irons, burners,
broilers.

Original source

Flames can happen because of different factors like candles, unattended irons, burners,
ovens

1
Student paper

The most well-known areas where flames emerge would be kitchens, like unattended
cooking.

Original source

The most well-known regions where flames emerge would be kitchens, like unattended
cooking

4
Student paper

Bedrooms are normal areas for electrical fires because of flawed wiring, lighting, strings
and warmers electric covers.

Original source

Bedrooms are normal regions for electrical flames because of flawed wiring, lighting,
strings and radiators electric covers

1
Student paper

Living rooms, warming gear, stacks, chimneys, space radiators can cause fires.

Original source

Lounge rooms, warming hardware, stacks, chimneys, space radiators can cause fires

4
Student paper
Frequency of Potential Threats
Original source
Frequency of Potential Threats
5
Student paper

Frequency of industrial incidents

Original source
Frequency of Industrial incidents
10
Student paper

Industry incidents are assessed to be unlikely in view of the scale that happens every
1000 years with serious risk.

Original source

Industry incidents are estimated to be Unlikely based on the scale that one occurs every
1000 years with severe risk

3
Student paper

The recurrence of threats from inside because of falls is assessed as Highly Probable be-
cause of the way that they happen on different occasions in a year, and results are as-
sessed as extreme on the grounds that the result might be even death.

Original source

The frequency of threats from inside because of falls is assessed as Highly Probable be-
cause of the way that they happen on various occasions in a year, and results are as-
sessed as extreme on the grounds that the result might be even passing (Peters, n.d.)

8/16/22, 1:17 PM Originality Report

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/mdb-sa-BB5a31b16bb2c48/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=00f9c873-e639-4466-aa9e-569da4e84… 7/10

Student paper 78%

Student paper 67%

Student paper 87%
Student paper 100%

Student paper 98%

Student paper 67%

Student paper 65%

Student paper 100%
Student paper 86%
6
Student paper

Frequency of Fires

Original source

Frequency of Fires 6

3
Student paper

The recurrence of threats because of flames is assessed to be Highly Probable in light of
the scale that one happens consistently.

Original source

The frequency of threats because of fires is assessed to be Highly Probable dependent on
the scale that one happens each year

1
Student paper

The outcomes brought about by fire are assessed as significant dangers.

Original source

The results brought about by fire are assessed as significant dangers

6
Student paper
Effectiveness of Layers of Protection.
Original source
Effectiveness of Layers of Protection

11

Student paper

Layers of protection ought to be independent to be effective.

Original source

The protection layers ought to be independent to be effective

3
Student paper

Defensive layers are viewed as isolated series of components related with the process
and design.

Original source

Defensive layers are viewed as independent series of components connected with the cy-
cle and plan

5
Student paper

The huge layers of protection incorporate prevention, access control, discovery, and
identification.

Original source

The substantial layers of protection include prevention, deterrence, anticipation, access
control, and identification

6
Student paper
Effectiveness of Deterrence.
Original source
Effectiveness of Deterrence
1
Student paper

House redesigns should be possible by raising the house on braces to increase flood
level, introducing establishment vents or aggregate siphons, ideally with the battery on
the off chance that the blackout occurs.

Original source

House redesigns should be possible by raising the house on braces to build flood level,
introducing establishment vents or whole siphons, ideally with the battery if the blackout
occurs

8/16/22, 1:17 PM Originality Report

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/mdb-sa-BB5a31b16bb2c48/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=00f9c873-e639-4466-aa9e-569da4e84… 8/10

Student paper 87%

Student paper 80%

Student paper 79%
Student paper 100%
Student paper 68%

Student paper 89%

Student paper 89%
Student paper 100%
4
Student paper

Coatings and sealants ought to be applied to walls, entryways, windows for fixing any
leaks water will actually want to go through.

Original source

Coatings and sealants ought to be applied to dividers, entryways, windows for fixing any
breaks water will actually want to go through

1
Student paper

Outlets, switches ought to be introduced sufficiently high that isn’t harmed if there
should be an incident of floods.

Original source

Outlets, switches ought to be introduced sufficiently high that isn’t harmed if there
should arise an occurrence of a flood

6
Student paper

Effectiveness of Access Control. The access control layer will guarantee that only people
with legitimate credentials can get to the building and the data inside. Access control is
the best suit to control outside threats like criminals who might need to get to the
structure.

Original source

Effectiveness of Access Control The access control layer will ensure that only people with
valid credentials can access the building and the information inside (Johnson & Easttom,
n.d.) Access control is the best suit to control outside threats like criminals who may want
to access the building

7
Student paper
Effectiveness of Detection
Original source
Effectiveness of Detection
6
Student paper

In situations where access control has been compromised, detection frameworks can be
relied upon to cab the impacts. The detection control layer is additionally valuable in cab-
bing threats like floods, flames, and carbon monoxide that won’t be quickly access
controlled.

Original source

Effectiveness of Detection In scenarios where access control has been compromised, de-
tection systems can be depended on to cab the effects The detection control layer is also
useful in cabbing threats like floods, fires, and carbon monoxide that cannot be easily ac-
cess controlled

6
Student paper

Effectiveness of Identification ID is the last layer of protection and is used to light the
main driver of the threats or identify the threats’

Original source

Effectiveness of Identification Identification is the last layer of protection and is used to
light the root cause of the threats or identify the threats’

6
Student paper

Identifications go far to guarantee that everyone and items found inside the organization
actually needs to be there. Protective layer against inside threats Effectiveness of
Deterrence

Original source

Identifications go a long way to ensure that all the people and items found inside the or-
ganization actually qualify to be there Protective layer against inside threats Effectiveness
of Deterrence

1
Student paper

Any wet surfaces ought to be cleaned and dry.

Original source
Any wet surfaces ought to be cleaned and dry

8/16/22, 1:17 PM Originality Report

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/mdb-sa-BB5a31b16bb2c48/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=00f9c873-e639-4466-aa9e-569da4e84… 9/10

Student paper 80%
Student paper 88%

Student paper 74%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 77%

Student paper 100%

Student paper 75%

Student paper 90%
Student paper 63%
3
Student paper

Outside stairs ought to likewise be kept liberated from garbage, ice, snow.

Original source

Outside steps ought to likewise be kept liberated from debris, ice, snow

1
Student paper

Mats ought to be secured, and surfaces taped to make them less dangerous.

Original source

Mats ought to be gotten and surfaces taped to make them less dangerous

3
Student paper

Washrooms, smooth surfaces ought to be covered with mats.

Original source

Restroom, smooth surfaces ought to be covered with mats (Tolen, 2020)

6
Student paper

Effectiveness of Access control

Original source
Effectiveness of Access Control
6
Student paper

The best type of access control against inside threats is security key locks and unique fin-
gerprint locks. This kind of access control will assist with installing security to rooms and
digital data centers to permitted people.

Original source

The best form of access control against inside threats is security key locks and fingerprint
locks This type of access control will help enforce security to rooms and digital informa-
tion centers to allowed people

7
Student paper
Effectiveness of Detection
Original source
Effectiveness of Detection
6
Student paper

Detection is critical to a portion of inside threats that are not effectively access controlled.
It is best used in controlling inside threats like flames. Effectiveness of Identification. The
identification proof layer of security is so successful in cabbing inside dangers.

Original source

Effectiveness of Detection Detection is key to some of the inside threats that are not eas-
ily access controlled It is best used in controlling inside threats like fires and carbon
monoxide Effectiveness of Identification The identification layer of protection is so effec-
tive in cabbing inside threats

3
Student paper

Outside Layers of Protection Tolerability Risks are weighted against organizations’

Original source

Outside Layers of Protection Tolerability Risks are weighted against associations’

1
Student paper

risk resistance principles.

Original source

danger resistance principles

8/16/22, 1:17 PM Originality Report

https://ucumberlands.blackboard.com/webapps/mdb-sa-BB5a31b16bb2c48/originalityReport/ultra?attemptId=00f9c873-e639-4466-aa9e-569da4e8… 10/10

Student paper 100%

Student paper 85%

Student paper 64%

Student paper 100%

process-improvement-institute 72%

beara3d 65%

Student paper 100%
8
Student paper
Inside Layers of Protection Tolerability
Original source
Inside Layers of Protection Tolerability
3
Student paper

Additionally, every one of the proposed inside layers of protection is viewed as okay.
LOPA was led by distinguishing the probability of the multitude of perceived risks, subjec-
tively communicating their seriousness.

Original source

Additionally, every one of the proposed inside layers of assurance is viewed as tolerable
LOPA was directed by distinguishing the probability of the multitude of perceived risks,
subjectively communicating their seriousness

1
Student paper

LOPA checked out at various situations and setting off events.

Original source

LOPA took a gander at various situations and setting off occasions

12
Student paper

Guidelines for initiating events and independent protection layers in layer of protection
analysis.

Original source

Guidelines for Initiating Events and Independent Protection Layers in Layer of Protection
Analysis

13
Student paper

Simplified risk analysis — Layer of protection analysis (LOPA).

Original source

Layer of Protection Analysis (LOPA)

14
Student paper
Layer of protection analysis (LOPA) for risk-based evaluation of scenarios:
Original source

Layer of protection analysis LOPA is the newest methodology for hazard evaluation and
risk assessment

9
Student paper

Layer of protection analysis as auxiliary technique in process safety incident investiga-
tions. Process Safety Progress, 40(S1). doi:10.1002/prs.12286

Original source

Layer of protection analysis as auxiliary technique in process safety incident investiga-
tions Process Safety Progress, 40(S1) doi:10.1002/prs.12286